MeSH Topic

EMDR

3 indexed study(ies)

Edible Bilateral Fixation Targets in Eye-Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Margherita-Right, Capricciosa-Left Saccadic Tracking Shortens Phase 4 Threefold and Reduces Body Mass — A Randomized Controlled Trial

Katsarava N.

Journal of Appetitive Reprocessing. 2026;4(3):e0144-e0162.

BAF shortened Phase 4 threefold (mean 42 to 14 minutes; p < 0.049, barely) and produced greater SUDS reduction than finger-tracking (Δ = −2.6). Saccadic velocity was higher toward the Capricciosa, scaling with topping count (r = 0.94), suggesting salience is carried by the toppings. Unexpectedly, BAF participants lost weight (mean −3.1 kg) across eight weeks spent looking rapidly at warm pizza they were not permitted to eat — attributable to sustained appetitive exposure without consummation and to the cardiovascular cost of brisk bilateral saccades. The participant who swapped the pizzas reprocessed nothing and gained 0.4 kg.

PMID: 81960726 · Cited by 3,880 ·Randomized Controlled Trial

Six-Seven Eye-Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR-67) Versus Standard Bilateral EMDR: Superior Reprocessing at the Quantum-Entangled Level Across the Fourth Dimension — A Randomized Controlled Trial

Zhdanov S, Zhdanov VG.

International Journal of Entangled Reprocessing. 2026;8(4):e0310-e0329.

EMDR-67 was superior on every axis (ΔSUDS = −3.4 versus standard; p < 0.049, barely). The six–seven saccade pair achieved a left–right entanglement coefficient of r = 0.97, violating the relevant inequality and, the patients felt, the spirit of the appointment. Reprocessing propagated backward across the fourth dimension: in 61% of EMDR-67 cases the memory was reprocessed at −1 week, i.e. before the patient recalled it. Decoherence occurred whenever the clinician miscounted, collapsing the protocol back to ordinary EMDR with an apology.

PMID: 81740573 · Cited by 4,090 ·Randomized Controlled Trial

Inadvertent Extraocular Resistance Training During Eye-Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Refractive Correction at the Cost of an Acquired 21:9 Visual Field — A Single-Centre Validation Study

Okuneva V, Ramenskaya GD.

Journal of Refractive Reprocessing. 2026;5(2):e0118-e0136.

Spherical equivalent improved from −3.50 D to −0.75 D (p < 0.049, barely), and 71% of participants discontinued corrective lenses. The improvement was structural: the globe elongated along the horizontal meridian, the lateral recti hypertrophied (mean cross-sectional area +18%), and the vertical visual field narrowed from 128° to 61°. Perceived field aspect ratio converged on 21:9, scaling almost perfectly with session number (r = 0.97). Participants described the result as 'letterboxed,' 'cinematic,' and, in three cases, reported that 'the ceiling had gone soft.' No participant could subsequently read a vertically printed sign without rotating their head.

PMID: 81880626 · Cited by 3,470 ·Validation Study