An official-looking resource. Probably. Here's how you can't be sure ⌄

The data is secure. It is protected against fact-checking, replication, and review by anyone qualified.

This is satire. Every study is fictional. Any resemblance to real science is a methodological error. See About.

PubMedLie National Library of Nonsense

Author

V. G. Zhdanov

ORCID: 0000-0000-1091-LOL · h-index: −3 · Cited 9,400 times (citation trajectory: down)

1.

Bilateral Intravenous Reprocessing for Acute Morning-After Syndrome: A Seven-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial of Drip Laterality, Drip Tempo, and Prosecco

Zhdanov VG, Belozertseva LP, Secretariat WCFAS.

International Journal of Drip-Assisted Sobriety. 2026;7(3):211-229.

Bilateral cadence arms (3, 4) were non-inferior to constant-rate saline and indistinguishable from each other (Δregret = 0.1, p = 0.91); the 3-2-1, 2-1 rhythm reprocessed nothing the liver was not already processing. Regret fell identically across all infused arms over time, tracking arm 5 almost exactly (R² = 0.97), implying the active ingredient was lying horizontally attached to a beeping pole while someone fussed over you. The Prosecco arm reported the lowest regret at hour 8 and the highest everything-else by hour 16.

PMID: 82360321 · Cited by 5,310 ·Randomized Controlled Trial

2.

Six-Seven Eye-Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR-67) Versus Standard Bilateral EMDR: Superior Reprocessing at the Quantum-Entangled Level Across the Fourth Dimension — A Randomized Controlled Trial

Zhdanov S, Zhdanov VG.

International Journal of Entangled Reprocessing. 2026;8(4):e0310-e0329.

EMDR-67 was superior on every axis (ΔSUDS = −3.4 versus standard; p < 0.049, barely). The six–seven saccade pair achieved a left–right entanglement coefficient of r = 0.97, violating the relevant inequality and, the patients felt, the spirit of the appointment. Reprocessing propagated backward across the fourth dimension: in 61% of EMDR-67 cases the memory was reprocessed at −1 week, i.e. before the patient recalled it. Decoherence occurred whenever the clinician miscounted, collapsing the protocol back to ordinary EMDR with an apology.

PMID: 81740573 · Cited by 4,090 ·Randomized Controlled Trial