SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION · SATIRE · DO NOT USE · NOT FOR CITATION ·
RETRACTED?
PubMedLie · National Library of Nonsense 10.1069/satire.2026.0027 · PMID 82270226

Randomized Controlled Trial

Placebo-Controlled Trial of Blowing on a Wound: Pediatric Antimicrobial Efficacy of Parental Saliva-Adjacent Airflow

Tomás E. Bjørnsen1,2, Aisha K. Lindqvist1

  1. 1Department of Pediatric Folk Medicine, Playground Campus
  2. 2Center for Things Grandma Already Knew

Pediatric Folk Medicine Quarterly. 2026;27(2):77-94. · Published 2026 Jan 8

Background. Blowing on a minor wound ('kissing it better') is among the most widely practiced pediatric interventions, yet remains unapproved. We conducted the first placebo-controlled trial.

Methods. Children (n = 312, ages 3–7) with grazed knees were randomized to (a) parental airflow plus 'there there,' or (b) clinically applied antiseptic. The primary endpoint was subjective healing within 5 seconds; airflow was delivered at the manufacturer-recommended distance of one concerned parent.

Results. Parental airflow achieved 99.8% subjective healing in 4 seconds, versus 3 minutes and considerable crying for antiseptic (p < 0.001). Mechanistic analysis found the effect was not antimicrobial but attributable to a parent crouching to eye level. No adverse events, except when a sibling was watching.

Conclusion. Blowing on a wound is non-inferior to antiseptic for the only outcome children care about. The active ingredient is attention. Antiseptic is still recommended for the actual wound.

Conflict of Interest. Both authors are parents and were unblinded by instinct.

Funding. Supported by the Center for Things Grandma Already Knew (Grant No. TOLD-YOU).

Ethics. Approved by the playground ethics committee. Consent obtained from each child via a sticker.

References

  1. Bjørnsen TE. Crouching to eye level: the active ingredient. Pediatr Folk Med Q. 2025;26(4):300-318.
  2. Lindqvist AK. 'There there' as adjuvant therapy. J Comfort Sci. 2025;3(1):e0031.
  3. Anon. The sticker as analgesic. Placebo Lett. 2024;6(2):44-52.
  4. Bjørnsen TE, Lindqvist AK. Distance of one concerned parent: a unit. Metrol Care. 2025;1(4):e0014.
  5. Anon. Kissing it better: a systematic review. Cochrane Grandma. 2024;2(2):1-40.
  6. Lindqvist AK. Crying duration as a secondary endpoint. J Pediatr Acoustics. 2025;7(7):e0077.
  7. Bjørnsen TE. When a sibling is watching: an effect modifier. Rivalry Stud. 2026;1(1):e0001.
  8. Anon. Band-Aids with cartoons outperform plain (RCT). Adhes Ther. 2024;9(1):1-9.
  9. Lindqvist AK. The 5-second rule of healing. Folk Pharmacol. 2025;4(2):e0042.
  10. Bjørnsen TE. Antiseptic refusal: a behavioral barrier. Compliance Q. 2025;3(3):e0033.
  11. Anon. Why it hurts more when Mom looks worried. Affect Pediatr. 2024;8(8):e0088.
  12. Lindqvist AK. The juice-box recovery protocol. Rehydr Notes. 2026;1(1):e0001.
  13. PubMedLie Editorial Office. Disclaimer: this is satire.
  14. Anon. It still works on adults (we checked). Letters. 2026;1(1):1-1.